Science and Pseudoscience
Story of the
N-Rays
Pseudoscience is
often characterized by contradictory, exaggerated or unfalsifiable claims;
reliance on confirmation bias rather than rigorous attempts at
refutation; lack of openness to evaluation by other experts; absence of
systematic practices when developing hypotheses; and continued adherence
long after the pseudoscientific hypotheses have been experimentally discredited.
The Discovery - A New Kind of Invisible Light
In early 1903, Professor René-Prosper Blondlot, a respected and well-established physicist at the University of Nancy in France, was experimenting with X-rays (discovered by Röntgen in 1895). He was investigating whether X-rays could be polarized.
Blondlot’s setup involved an X-ray tube and a spark
gap in a dark room. He observed that the brightness of the spark seemed to
increase slightly when he passed the X-rays through an aluminum prism.
Intrigued, he continued his experiments and eventually concluded that he had
discovered a new form of radiation, entirely distinct from X-rays. He named
them N-rays (after his hometown of Nancy).
[Prosper-René Blondlot was a professor of physics at the
University of Nancy studying electromagnetic radiation. Blondlot was a
respected member of the scientific community and one of eight physicists who
were corresponding members of the French Academy of Sciences and was awarded
the Academy's Gaston Planté prize in 1893 and the LaCaze prize in 1899. His
attempts to measure the speed of electromagnetic waves were commended by J J Thomson
and Henri Poincaré. Blondlot began investigating the nature of X-rays shortly
after their discovery, trying to determine whether they behaved as particles or
electromagnetic waves. This was before wave-particle duality became widely
accepted among scientists.]
The Properties - Elusive and Bizarre
Blondlot and, soon, dozens of other scientists in France (particularly in Nancy) began reporting a flood of amazing properties for N-rays:
- Emission: They were emitted not only by X-ray tubes but also by incandescent light bulbs, gas flames, and even certain metals under stress.
- Detection: The primary detector was the human eye, specifically its ability to perceive a faintly illuminated object in a dark room. N-rays were said to make a dim spark appear brighter or a faintly glowing painted surface easier to see.
- Strange Interactions: They could be stored in certain materials (like brick or wood) and re-emitted later (!). They could be refracted by aluminum and quartz prisms, and even focused with lenses.
- Biological Emission: Most remarkably, Blondlot and others claimed that the human body, particularly the nervous system, emitted N-rays. They reported that the rays intensified when a person was excited and diminished when asleep or under anesthesia.
The Frenzy - Acceptance and Skepticism
For a few years, N-rays were a sensation, primarily in France.
- Widespread Acclaim: Over 100 scientists published nearly 300 papers on the phenomenon.
- Prestigious Recognition: In 1904, the French Academy of Sciences awarded Blondlot their prestigious Leconte Prize, largely for his discovery of N-rays.
- National Pride: The discovery became a matter of national pride, seen as a French answer to the German Röntgen's X-rays and the Englishman Crookes's work on cathode rays.
However, outside of France, particularly in Germany,
Britain, and the United States, physicists were deeply skeptical. A major red
flag was that no one outside the core French group could replicate the effects.
The key "measurement" was a subjective visual judgment—"Does
this spark look brighter to you?"—which was notoriously prone to bias.
The Demise - The American Skeptic
The turning point came with Robert W Wood, a brilliant
and pragmatic American physicist from Johns Hopkins University, who was deeply
skeptical of the entire affair.
In 1904, the journal Nature sent Wood to Blondlot's
laboratory in Nancy to investigate firsthand.
Wood witnessed Blondlot's demonstrations with all due
attention. In one key experiment, Blondlot used an aluminum prism to project an
N-ray spectrum onto a screen with a faintly glowing paint, claiming he could
see distinct bright lines. Wood, in the dark room, saw nothing.
The decisive moment came when Wood, unseen by
Blondlot, secretly removed the crucial aluminum prism from the experimental
apparatus.
When Blondlot continued his demonstration, he
confidently described the N-ray spectrum and its bright lines exactly as
before, even though the essential component for creating that spectrum was
lying in Wood's pocket.
In another experiment involving the dimming of a spark
when a heavy file was placed in the N-ray path, Wood silently replaced the file
with a piece of wood of similar size. Blondlot still reported the spark
dimming, proving the effect was entirely in his mind.
The Aftermath - A Lesson in Scientific Rigor
Wood published his devastating account in Nature in
1904. The report was polite but unequivocal: the phenomena were illusory.
The impact was swift and brutal.
- Loss of Credibility: Blondlot's reputation was destroyed. He never recovered from the humiliation and spent the rest of his life in obscurity, still believing in his discovery.
- Rapid Collapse: Interest in N-rays evaporated almost overnight. The field, which had seemed so promising, was exposed as a house of cards built on subjective observation and experimenter bias.
- The "N-Ray
Effect": The case became a textbook example of the ideomotor effect and
confirmation bias. Scientists saw what they expected to see. The slight,
natural fluctuations in the perception of a dim spark were interpreted as real
effects caused by their manipulations.
The Legacy
The story of N-rays is not just a historical
curiosity; it serves as a permanent lesson for all scientists:
1. The Necessity of Blind and Double-Blind
Experiments: To avoid bias, the person measuring an effect should not know
whether the experimental condition is active or not.
2. The Danger of Subjective Measurement: Human senses
are easily fooled. Objective, instrument-based measurement is crucial.
3. The Importance of Skepticism: Healthy skepticism
and independent replication are the bedrock of the scientific method.
4. The Power of Expectation: The story is a powerful
demonstration of how a strong belief can literally alter one's perception of
reality.
In the end, N-rays were not a new form of radiation,
but a profound insight into the psychology of science itself.
[
