Friday, February 28, 2025

Seeking Out Fear!

The Paranormal as an Invention of Humankind


A hosted article by Ilavenil T

 

"My life has been full of terrible misfortunes, most of which never happened."


- Michel de Montaigne

 

Ilavenil T

 

This article is not about ghosts, nor is it ghost-written, but guest-written! Neither the guest nor the host is phasmophobic!

Ilavenil is an educator by profession, and holds an M Phil in Theoretical Physics and an M A in Education.  She is an avid observer of the wonders of the night sky, and also the proud owner of a telescope, seen in the picture above, not trying to seek out anything in particular with the instrument. Among other attainments, she has played a role in 57 provisional asteroid discoveries as a Regional Trainer in the International Astronomical Search Collaboration.  I have known her professionally, and as a writer of considerable skill, meriting greater exposure.  The paranormal and supernatural have always fascinated her, as stories. But as a third-generation sceptic, she has always found reasons behind them that are normal, natural and rational.

When she was reluctant to host her own blog, I suggested that she could be my guest, at least temporarily.  This marks her foray as a guest blogger under my banner, hopefully until it is time for her own.


Stephen King, the most popular author in the horror genre, says that he does not like to sleep with one leg sticking out of the sheets.

His reasoning:

"Because if a cool hand ever reached out from under the bed and grasped my ankle, I might scream."   

He also explains:

"I know that the thing waiting to grab my ankle isn't real. I know that, and I also know that if I'm careful to keep my foot under the covers, it will never be able to grab my ankle."

Why does every culture have a collection of ghosts, devils and demons along with their gods? Why do we consume horror movies and books?

This article is my attempt to look at the paranormal as a human invention. Starting with the need for fear and the human tendency to weave stories, to how human anxieties create demons and change them as the fears change, to the fact that no one has ever produced evidence of the paranormal.

Ghost sightings

Why are there so many people who have claimed to have seen ghosts or other paranormal phenomena?

A survey conducted by the Pew research centre in 2009 showed that 18% of Americans claimed to have seen some form of supernatural activity [1]. I could find no such survey conducted in India, but there are many websites that list haunted locations and list personal experiences. Can all these be untrue?

I have had friends share their experiences of ghost sightings with me. There is always one thing in common – whoever told me that they have seen a ghost had their own explanations of why the ghost was there, or why it left them unharmed.

I could hear another set of footsteps behind me at 2 AM. I knew that it was someone from my family, keeping me safe.

We heard giggles and anklets jingling. We knew we should not have bought a house ‘there’, but the land was cheap. We could do nothing – we were too scared to go near the door! But after a few days, it stopped.

It was never a list of facts; it was always a story.

My opinion is that each “true” ghost story has a modicum of truth in it – the person definitely saw something. But the circumstances and the interpretation of their own minds resulted in a narrative that could effectively convey the fear that they felt at that moment. Let’s see what can lead to people seeing things.

Phenomena that can lead to ghost sightings

Negative after-image: When we look at something bright and look away, the cells in the retina are stimulated. When they stay stimulated even after the stimulus, it results in a negative after-image – an image of the same shape, but with opposing colours. To test it out, stare at the image below for 20 seconds, then look at a piece of paper.

You will see an image like a photograph. This phenomenon can make people see shadows and bright objects where there are none.

Pareidolia

Pareidolia is the phenomenon where we see a familiar image in random patterns. This comes from the natural tendency to make order out of disorder. Pareidolia often makes people see human faces where there are none.

An example is the “Overseer of Ebihens” – this seems like a distinctly human face, but is just part of a cliff.


Sleep Paralysis

This is a state during waking or falling asleep where a person is conscious but paralysed. There can be hallucinations during this period, and it is very common. A person in sleep paralysis can see or hear things, and experience fear. But why do we experience fear when there is no danger?

Fear as a survival mechanism

Humans are an incredibly fragile species. We do not have the strength, speed or the defences (nails and teeth) of the animals that can prey on us. We can thrive only in a limited range of temperatures, and see only a narrow band of the electromagnetic spectrum. Over 3 million years, the fragile homo genus has survived and adapted to the world mainly through one evolutionary advantage – our large brains. We, Homo Sapiens have brains that are very different from other animals and even the other homo species.

The main difference between the brains of humans and other animal species is the cerebral cortex. This part of the brain is mainly responsible for cognition and consciousness, as well as awareness, attention, perception, thought, memory and language.


Even within the genus homo, the human brain stands out. These are comparisons of the brains of Homo Neanderthalis, a species who evolved in Europe while Homo Sapiens evolved in Africa. According to some estimates, they might have survived for 400,000 years before going extinct. This could have been a result of climate change, as well as modern humans migrating from Africa and competing for their resources. However, the Neanderthals were also an intelligent species – according to some studies they might have been smarter than us.  They used weapons, hunted large prey, produced art, used symbols and cared for their sick and injured [2].

What then, set human beings apart from Neanderthals? One is the complexity of human language.


Reconstructed brains of Neanderthals based on fossil skulls compared with those of early Homo sapiens. ©Keio University

In the above image, even though the brains seem to be of comparable size, they vary in morphology. The main difference in this case is that the cerebellum of homo sapiens is more developed than that of Neanderthals, another Homo species. The cerebellum is responsible for motor control and balance, and also plays a part in attention, language control and emotional control.

These findings, albeit oversimplified, point to a few reasons for the survival of our species:

Memory – A large memory helps in not repeating mistakes.

Language – the ability to communicate dangers, presence of food or predators and new discoveries and inventions.

Critical thinking and problem solving – Taming fire, agriculture, tool use, metallurgy… all the way up to the internet and smartphones. This is what makes us human [3].

But all this depended on ancient humans sensing danger. It was not enough to perceive the danger directly; it was also necessary to detect danger indirectly and predict it in advance.

All animals can sense the presence of a predator indirectly through fear, but our ancestors made sense of the fear, assigned it a cause and worked out solutions. This involved gathering data and finding patterns, and the better a tribe communicated among themselves, the better their survival. This is where a skill that is unique to us comes into play – storytelling.

Storytelling: The essence of being human

Humans have a tendency to create stories and a narrative about everything they see. Storytelling is an efficient method of communication. Not only do we remember better when facts are woven into stories, but we can also communicate emotion – happiness, misery, fear.

Storytelling as the driver of abstract thought

According to Enrico Coen in Heredity [4], how the human tendency to tell stories is the reason for our increase in intelligence and our ability to discuss abstract ideas.

 “The origins of human intelligence and the scientific mind are to be found in the two-headed nature of stories, their ability to both inform and deceive.” In this paper, he says that science is a result of the need for humans to test whether a story is true or not, and that we don’t tell stories only to others, but to ourselves.

The requirement to look at a story critically and separate truth from fiction was the reason for our intellectual development. This also lies at the heart of the scientific method, where we check if a hypothesis can be falsified.

The way stories are used to inform and entertain is clear when we look at Astronomy, arguably the oldest science. John Hawks, a paleoanthropologist, in his blog notes that practically all ancient cultures have monuments that align with the stars and the solstices. Our ancestors used the night sky first as a navigational aid, but every culture built a narrative on the patterns they saw in the sky.  They could track the migration patterns of animals as well as the changing seasons. This led to the development of calendars and agriculture, starting off civilization. However, in the process, they also developed a rich tapestry of stories – of animals, people, gods and demigods. And astronomers know where the fiction ends and science begins. [5]

On the other hands, the sky has been used to tell stories that deceive and mislead too. The same observations used to draw up the lunar and solar calendars have been appropriated by astrology, a pseudoscience. The ‘best’ astrologers with the most accurate predictions are just excellent storytellers – a mixture of listening and spinning narratives to let their clients hear exactly what they want to.

There are some common stories in all cultures. The following are examples – this is not an exhaustive list.

Where did we come from?

Origin myths vary from culture to culture, with the Earth as a flat plate supported by tortoises, elephants, whales or any other large animal that lived in that part of the world. The sky became a bowl or a tent [6].

Flood myths

Flooding and being driven out of their homes, while losing most of the population is something every civilization has gone through. Flood myths tell the story of a saviour being warned of the flood by a supernatural power and rescuing a select few individuals, who then repopulate the world [7].

Animal stories

The other common theme in all cultures is of animal stories, starting from the creation myths. Predators took up evil forms to be feared, and harmless animals became the “good” protagonists [8].

All these stories have aspects that entertain, engage in fantasies, but they also carry a common theme – a fear of the unknown. A supernatural power which created the world can destroy it. An animal might attack you. Some people are devious and harmful.

Monsters and supernatural creatures in history

While creation myths were fantasies about the unknown past, and animal stories a clear warning on the danger than was present, humans also needed a way to tell stories about the fears that they do not understand. Ghost stories fill this gap. They also show a way of coping with the human anxiety about death – its finality. Let’s take a closer look at some common monsters.

Ghosts

A ghost is the spirit of a person who is deceased. Across the world, they take the form of white, misty shapes. Though it might be tempting to call this evidence – why would people who have never encountered each other have the same type of monster? The answer is simple: Breath takes a misty shape in cold weather, and the belief that it is what animates a person is an easy step.

I did try to find sources on how ghosts look in a hot, tropical climate like Chennai, but was not able to. Anecdotally, none of my “sources” have reported a misty white being – no matter where they live.

Vampires

A reanimated corpse that leaves its grave and walks, and drinks the blood of other organisms for sustenance. The reasons for a person turning into a vampire varies – an attack from another vampire, indulging in black magic or being born with Mars in the wrong box of their horoscope.

The belief comes from people observing corpses with ‘signs of life’. When flesh shrinks after death, nails and hair appear longer, and the cold weather in some climates led to corpses being preserved naturally. This was seen as a sign of the person being alive in the absence of a pulse. In Europe, vampire stories reached a peak along with a fear of tuberculosis – the wasting away of patients was seen to be the work of a vampire.

Werewolves

Unexplained attacks by animals led to the view that humans can take animal form, and shape-shifting myths are there in many cultures. The werewolf myth originated from a fear of rabies, where a person seems to lose their humanity and change into an animal.[9]

Fear and storytelling in the 21st century

The 21st century no longer requires us to fear predators and the darkness, but our struggle to survive has left us with fear. Even though our modern world has its own share of dangers and fears – climate change, for example, these fears are not urgent enough to bring about a physical reaction.

The chill down the spine, the sense that something is moving in the shadows, the soft sounds that should not exist, the dry mouth, the petrified limbs. There is a need for us to feel the fear, and the relief of being safe. When there is nothing to fear, what else can we do but create our own?

Adventure sports, where people experience a thrill of being in danger without any actual risk of life are extremely popular now. In the same vein, we have the horror movie and novel industry, thriving in all languages. In these cases, even though the situation is imaginary, the fear is real.

Paranormal ‘Research’

We have our own monsters in the 21st century. In my opinion, misinformation is the biggest monster that we are fighting right now. The ease with which information can be communicated and videos can be made (and edited) has led to a massive number of ‘real ghost videos’ and ‘evidences for paranormal activity.’

As someone who has indulged in writing horror stories myself, let me start with my personal reasons on why I believe that supernatural monsters are fictional.

Brain damage and loss of memory

When there is damage to the brain, people lose their memory. When certain parts are damaged, there are certain functions lost. When blood flow to the brain is interrupted for five minutes, there is loss of cognitive function. Patients with Alzheimer’s disease have plaques in their brains, clearly seen in a CT.

When it is clear that memories and language are just a product of electrical function in the brain, how can they possibly persist after death?

Debunking the supernatural

Again, let me start with my own experience of debunking a ‘ghost.’ This does not fit the normal ghost story narrative, as the person who saw it is herself a sceptic. She told me what she saw, not her own interpretation of what it might be – or who it might have been.

This was the experience: “At 3 AM yesterday night, I closed the door, turned and saw a black shadow, like a human, my height, in the middle of the room.”

That night, I set about retracing her steps. Closing the door (light coloured) also shut off the bright light from inside, which meant that my eyes had been set up to see a negative self-image, which would be dark. I turned, and there it was, a negative image floating in the middle of the room. It was also vaguely human – pareidolia in action.

I was surprised to see that my brain, while I was still cognizant of what was happening, could take a negative self-image, make it human shaped and play it back to me.

This is how ghost sightings work.

The lack of evidence

There is no evidence of any paranormal phenomena. There have been many attempts to rigorously study the paranormal using the scientific method, starting from the 1800s.

The Society for Psychical Research (SPR) was founded in 1882 in the UK to investigate paranormal phenomena scientifically. The purpose was to investigate the sudden proliferation of apparitions and clairvoyant dreams, and especially to investigate the new ‘mediums’ who said they could communicate with the dead [10].

Harry Houdini, arguably one of the best illusionists of all time, spent the later part of his life actively exposing mediums and other frauds. He could demonstrate that all their ‘supernatural’ phenomena were barely illusions. He sat through many seances and came up with practical, mundane explanations for ‘ectoplasm’ and visions. He even testified before Congress for the criminalization of fortune-telling for hire and “any person pretending to … unite the separated.” [11]

CSICOP - the Committee for Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal (CSICOP) was founded in the United States in 1976. Their magazine, the Skeptical Inquirer has articles in which claims of the paranormal are put to rigorous scientific testing. Not one has been unexplained so far [12].

The Indian Rationalist Association was founded in 1949, to promote scientific scepticism and critique supernatural claims. They have conducted numerous campaigns over the decades to disprove claims of miracles, superstitions and pseudoscience [13].

In addition to these, there are a number of prizes and rewards [14] for those who can prove the existence of the paranormal, adding up to a total of 14,08,424 USD.

If ghosts and monsters exist, why hasn’t anyone claimed these prizes?

My first foray into writing horror was, like many other firsts in my life, a speech for Toastmasters. The audience response was excellent – people actually asked if it really happened. However, a few days later, I opened my eyes on an overnight bus journey and saw the “vampire” as I visualized her sitting in the seat beside me.

Of course she was not there. But that is how powerful the brain can be in creating visuals.

It is important to approach any claim of the paranormal, or anything that is unexplained with not just scientific scepticism, but also a healthy respect for our evolutionary history and the power of our minds.

References*

  1. Pew Research Center. "18% of Americans Say They've Seen a Ghost." Pew Research Center, 30 Oct. 2015, www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2015/10/30/18-of-americans-say-theyve-seen-a-ghost/.
  2. Natural History Museum. "Who Were the Neanderthals?" Natural History Museum, www.nhm.ac.uk/discover/who-were-the-neanderthals.html.
  3. Keio University. "A." Keio Research Highlights, Aug. 2018, research-highlights.keio.ac.jp/2018/08/a.html.
  4. National Center for Biotechnology Information. "PMC6781149." PubMed Central, www.pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6781149/#Sec9.
  5. Hawks, John. "When Did Our Ancestors Start Looking Up to the Stars?" John Hawks Weblog, johnhawks.net/weblog/when-did-our-ancestors-start-looking-up-to-the-stars/.
  6. Gier, Nathaniel. "Introduction to Greco-Roman Religion." University of Idaho, webpages.uidaho.edu/ngier/gre13.htm.
  7. "A Flood of Myths and Stories." PBS Independent Lens, www.pbs.org/independentlens/blog/a-flood-of-myths-and-stories/.
  8. "Animal Stories Through the Ages." Birds, Blooms, and Bumbles, birdsbloomsandbumbles.com/animal-stories-through-the-ages/
  9. "Antrocom." Antrocom, vol. 5, no. 2, 2009, pp. 53, antrocom.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Antrocom-5-2-2009.pdf#page=53
  10. Society for Psychical Research. Society for Psychical Research, www.spr.ac.uk.
  11. Nichols, Chris. "For Harry Houdini, Séances and Spiritualism Were Just an Illusion." Smithsonian Magazine, Smithsonian Institution, www.smithsonianmag.com/history/for-harry-houdini-seances-and-spiritualism-were-just-an-illusion-180978944/.
  12. Skeptical Inquirer. Skeptical Inquirer, skepticalinquirer.org.
  13. Harris, John. "Fear Itself." The New York Times, 20 May 2001, www.nytimes.com/2001/05/20/weekinreview/may-13-19-fear-itself.html.
  14. Wikipedia contributors. "List of Prizes for Evidence of the Paranormal." Wikipedia, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_prizes_for_evidence_of_the_paranormal.

*Also see here for details of a landmark Indian publication, “Science, Nonscience and the Paranormal.”

  

Sunday, February 16, 2025

 

Nobel Laureates in the Family

New Kannada Book Review 

 

The Nobel Prize is an honor unique in the world in having found its way into the hearts and minds of simple people everywhere.

-       George Wald

 


The Nobel prizes have become synonymous with the pinnacle of human achievement in different spheres. So far, over a thousand prizes have been awarded, mostly to individuals.  Interestingly, only seven pairs of father-children awardees are to be found among them in the long history of these awards. This is the subject of a recent publication in Kannada authored by Prof P Venkataramiah, a noted physicist and educator of the University of Mysore. It is also the inspiration and basis for this blog article in which I have taken some liberties, going slightly beyond the scope of the publication.


Preamble

When the classroom atmosphere gets heavy, a resourceful teacher often steps outsides the confines of the coursework to relieve the tedium and tries to make the subject matter a bit spicy.  One way to do this is to bring in historical elements to the teaching. In the sciences, a rich subject for such diversion is the Nobel Prize, won by the very best in the discipline, with a dazzling aura associated with it.  My friend and former classmate Dr P Venkataramiah (shortened to PV in the rest of this article), who is a former vice-chancellor of the Kuvempu University as well as a retired professor of physics of the University of Mysore, has done this with relish in his teaching days, and has just written a book in Kannada on the rare duo of seven father and son/daughter awardees, five of whom happen to be in his own field of physics.

The book (see the title page above with a picture of Alfred Nobel) was recently released by the present vice-chancellor of the University of Mysore Prof N K Loknath in the presence of former vice-chancellor of KSOU, Prof N S Rame Gowda, and other dignitaries. I had the great pleasure of talking about the contents of the book to an enlightened audience.

The Contents

The book has an impressive foreword by Distinguished Professor K J Rao, formerly of the Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, and its (Kannada equivalent) contents are organized as follows:

    Chapter 1: Introduction
    Chapter 2: J J Thomson and G P Thomson
    Chapter 3: Henry Bragg and Lawrence Bragg
    Chapter 4: Niels Bohr
    Chapter 5: Structure of the Atom
    Chapter 6: A Wholesome Family brimming with happiness
    Chapter 7: Philosopher Niels Bohr
    Chapter 8: Pierre Curie
    Chapter 9: Frederic Joliot
    Chapter 10: Karl Manne Georg Siegbahn
    Chapter 11: Arthur Kornberg and Roger Kornberg
    Chapter 12: Hans von Euler-Chelpin

Given below are short chapter wise summaries with some variations and embellishments of my own, also introducing a number of pictures not present in the book under discussion:

Ch 1: Introduction

This examines mainly the comparative roles of genetic and environmental factors in the transmission of intelligence traits from generation to generation, and discusses how exceptional achievements like the winning of Nobel prizes in successive generations is a rarity, with only seven father-child examples to consider. A key observation is that environment plays a much greater role than the genes.

Ch 2:  Joseph John Thomson (1856 – 1940) and George Paget Thomson (1892 – 1975)

J J Thomson & G P Thomson

Going as far back as Faraday’s pathbreaking experiments on electromagnetic phenomena, this chapter begins with a description of various physical phenomena, including Rayleigh scattering of light, the concept of the atom, discovery of cathode rays and the study of their behavior in Crook’s vacuum tubes, J J Thomson’s discovery of the electron and the nature of its electric charge, and how these discoveries led to Rutherford’s picture of the atomic nucleus. The identification of the electron as a fundamental constituent of all atoms, and of all matter, follows. PV then goes on to present a biographical sketch of the physicist emphasizing his overall broadmindedness despite his early irrational opposition to Einstein’s theories.

Sir J J Thomson was the recipient of a Nobel Prize in Physics in 1906 for his discovery of the electron which is now such a familiar part of all our lives.

In the subsection on G P Thomson, PV starts with a discussion of the dual nature of light, the spectrum of black body radiation, and the wave nature of matter as conclusively established through the experimental discovery of electron diffraction.  G P Thomson was awarded a Nobel Prize in physics in 1937 for this work. Rather ironically, the father-son duo got their prizes for discovering seemingly contradictory properties (particles and waves) of the electron, something that is fully consistent with quantum physics.    

Ch 3:  William Henry Bragg (1862 – 1942) and William Lawrence Bragg (1890 – 1971)

The Braggs

In this short chapter, PV presents both a historical account of the early developments in X-ray crystallographic studies and a biographical sketch of the Bragg father-son duo who worked initially in Australia and later shifted to England.  They were jointly awarded the Nobel Prize for physics in 1915 for their X-ray diffraction studies with crystals, the only instance of a father-son duo winning the award in the same year. Also, at just 25, Lawrence Bragg was the youngest scientist ever to win a Nobel prize.

Ch 4:  Niels Bohr (1885 – 1962) 

This entire chapter is devoted to the early life of Danish theoretical physicist Niels Bohr, undoubtedly one of the greatest scientists of the twentieth century. This is essentially the history of Europe of the times, characterized by some monumental developments in which Niels Bohr himself was a central player.

Ch 5:  Structure of the Atom

In this chapter, PV leaves Niels Bohr temporarily aside and makes a long detour of the developments that led to an understanding of the structure of the atom and its constituents through a study of the spectra of hydrogen and other elements. Midway through the chapter, he brings Niels Bohr back into the thick of things, goes through some details of his personal life, the eventual award of the Nobel prize for physics in 1922 for his seminal contributions on the understanding of atomic structure, and finally his evolving friendship with Albert Einstein that later developed into a long intellectual conflict directed at the very foundations of quantum physics to which both had made outstanding contributions. 

Niels Bohr and Albert Einstein

Ch 6:  A Wholesome Family brimming with happiness

Not done with Niels Bohr yet, PV continues with a narration related to the great man’s wife and large family, his travels to other countries, including the USA, and his wide popularity at home. Despite some major personal tragedies, including the death of a son* in tragic circumstances, Bohr’s family was a contented and happy one, a fact that is the main focus of this chapter.

[* Niels Bohr’s eldest of six sons, Christian, died tragically in a boating accident in 1934 at the age of 18 even as the father was looking on helplessly, and another, Harald, was severely mentally disable and died at the age of about 10.]

The discussion then shifts to another path-breaking discovery in which Niels Bohr had a hand, the liquid drop model of the atomic nucleus, that was to play a crucial role later in the understanding of uranium fission and its staggering consequences. This discovery also set the stage for the entry of his son Aage Bohr (1922 – 2009) into researching the shapes of nuclei and the collective motion of nucleons within an atomic nucleus. This work later brought him a share of the 1975 Nobel prize for physics. Below is a memorable picture of the father-son duo, taken much before this happened.

Other models that shaped nuclear physics at the time are also discussed at some length in this chapter. 

It is interesting to note that the father contributed crucially to the understanding of the atom and the son did the same for the understanding of the nucleus of the atom.

Ch 7:  Philosopher Niels Bohr

Niels Bohr was not just a pioneering physicist; he was also a profound philosopher whose ideas reshaped the philosophy of science. Central to this was the principle of complementarity according to which seemingly contradictory properties (such as wave-particle duality) are intrinsic to nature.  He championed the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics that challenged the classical notions of objective reality, in glaring and triumphant opposition to Einstein’s ideas on the issue.  He was also an advocate for the responsible use of science and the unity of human knowledge.  These are well reflected in this chapter which is seemingly unrelated to the main theme of the book.

Ch 8:  Pierre Curie

‘The Curies’ would have been a more appropriate title to this chapter considering how the legendary Marie Sklodowska Curie is at least as responsible as her husband Pierre Curie for what followed, with their daughter (Irene Joliot) and son-in-law (Frederic Joliot) both ending up with Nobel prizes, apart from the fact that they themselves could show as many as three prizes between them – an astonishing fact in the history of the Nobel Prize.

Below are priceless pictures of the two couples, a generation apart:

For the record, Pierre Curie (1859 – 1906) and Marie Curie (1867 – 1934) were awarded the 1903 Nobel prize in physics jointly, along with Henri Becquerel for the discovery of radioactivity.  The award to Marie followed only after Pierre had threatened to refuse the prize if she was unjustly excluded from it.  Later, in 1911, she was the sole winner of the Nobel Prize in chemistry for the discovery of radioactive elements radium and polonium. Pierre too would have had a share of it if the award could have been conferred posthumously.

Ch 9:  Frederic Joliot

This chapter describes the work of Frederic Joliot-Curie (1900 – 1958) who married Irene Curie (1897 – 1956) in 1926 and chose to add the Curie surname to his own out of respect for their achievements and legacy. The two were partners in some groundbreaking research that resulted in the 1935 discovery of induced radioactivity in natural elements. In the process, they had also come close to discovering the neutron, later credited to James Chadwick of England. They had also sown the seeds for the subsequent nuclear fission experiments that were to influence the course of human history radically.

It is another curious fact in the history of twentieth century physics that Marie Curie and Pierre Curie discovered natural radioactivity whereas Frederic Joliot-Curie and Irene Curie ended up discovering artificial radioactivity.

The contribution of the Curie family is indeed unparalleled in the annals of physics.

Ch 10: Karl Manne Georg Siegbahn 

Kai and Karl Siegbahn at work

This short chapter discusses the contributions of the Swedish physicist Karl Manne Georg Siegbahn (1986 – 1978) and his son Kai Manne Borje Siegbahn in the field of spectroscopy. Father Karl Siegbahn was awarded the 1924 Nobel prize in physics for his discoveries and research in the field of X-Ray Spectroscopy, and his son Kai was awarded the 1981 Nobel prize in physics for his contribution to the development of high-resolution electron spectroscopy. 

Considering that a physicist is writing about two Nobel laureates who are also physicists, this chapter could have been conceived in greater detail.

Ch 11: Arthur Kornberg and Roger Kornberg 

Arthur Kornberg and Roger Kornberg

Besides providing brief biographical information, this chapter brings out the following facts regarding this father-son due from the USA:

The Kornbergs represent a remarkable legacy in the field of biochemistry, each making groundbreaking contributions that have profoundly advanced our understanding of molecular biology. Arthur Kornberg, the father, was a pioneering scientist whose work laid the foundation for modern genetics. His son, Roger Kornberg, followed in his footsteps, achieving his own monumental discoveries.

Arthur Kornberg (1918–2007) is best known for his discovery of the mechanisms underlying DNA synthesis. In 1959, he was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology/Medicine for his work on the enzymatic synthesis of DNA. His research demonstrated how DNA is replicated in cells, a process essential for life. His work not only advanced basic science but also paved the way for advancements in biotechnology.

Roger Kornberg (born 1947), inspired by his father’s passion for science, pursued a career in biochemistry and made his own groundbreaking discoveries. In 2006, he was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for his studies on the molecular basis of eukaryotic transcription, elucidating how genetic information in DNA is transcribed into messenger RNA (mRNA), a crucial step in gene expression. This knowledge has profound implications for understanding diseases and developing therapies, particularly in cancer and genetic disorders.

Ch 12: Hans von Euler-Chelpin 

This chapter brings out the fact that the German-born Swedish biochemist Hans von Euler-Chelpin (1873 - 1964) and his son Ulf Svante von Euler (1905 - 1983) were a remarkable father-son duo who both won Nobel Prizes for their groundbreaking contributions to biosciences. Hans was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1929 for his work on enzymes and fermentation, particularly his discovery of cozymase, a key coenzyme in metabolic processes. His research laid the foundation for modern biochemistry.

Ulf, a physiologist, won the Nobel Prize in Physiology/Medicine in 1970 for identifying noradrenaline as the primary neurotransmitter in the sympathetic nervous system, revolutionizing our understanding of neurophysiology. He also discovered Substance P and prostaglandins, which are critical in pain and inflammation research.

The chapter also contains brief biographical sketches of the duo.

Extending the Scope

The book discusses only the (seven) instances of father-child duo of Nobel laureates that are known to exist so far.  What if the criteria are expanded to include anyone in the larger family tree? Would the number go up significantly? I took the assistance of two AI apps to answer this question, and I came up with the following four additions to PV’s list in the book:

  • Uncle & Nephew - C V Raman (1930) & S Chandrasekhar (1983) – Both Physics - India/USA

C V Raman and S Chandrasekhar


  • Brothers - Jan Tinbergen (Economics, 1969) & Nicolaas Tinbergen (Medicine, 1973) – Denmark

Jan and Nicolaas Tinbergen

  • Couple – Gunnar Myrdal (Economics, 1974) & Wife Alva Myrdal (Peace, 1982) – Sweden

Alva & Gunnar Myrdal

  • Couple - May-Britt Moser (Physiology, 2014) & Husband Edvard I Moser (Physiology, 2014) – Norway

May-Britt and Edvard Moser

This is certainly a welcome addition to the original list, but hardly significant in terms of just numbers.

The Bottomline

No matter how one looks at the facts, environmental factors seem to play an overwhelmingly greater role in the passage of high-caliber intelligence from generation to generation!

Tailpiece


Last year, I wrote an article titled “Nobel Prize in Physics – the Unlucky Thirteen!”, championing the cases of thirteen great physicists of the twentieth century who deserved to get the award but missed out because there was ‘no room at the top’. Below is my list of the unlucky thirteen (the two Bose’s from India are unrelated):

    1. Jagadish Chandra Bose (1858 - 1937) - India
    2. Henrietta Swan Leavitt (1868 - 1921) - USA
    3. Lise Meitner (1878 - 1968) - Austrian/Swedish
    4. Edwin Hubble (1889 - 1953) - USA
    5. Satyendra Nath Bose (1894 - 1974) - India
    6. Georges Lemaitre (1894 - 1966) - Belgium
    7. Robert Oppenheimer (1904 - 1967) - USA
    8. Chien-Shiung Wu (1912 - 1997) - China/USA
    9. John Stewart Bell (1928 - 1990) - Northern Ireland
    10. Vera Rubin (1928 - 2016) - USA
    11. George Sudarshan (1931 - 2018) - India/USA
    12. Stephen Hawking (1942 - 2018) - England
    13. Jocelyn Bell Burnell (1943 -) - England

Addendum

A very discerning reader, Dr A G Kulkarni of Bangalore, has pointed out that the two AI apps I had relied on have failed to mention a fifth addition to Prof PV’s list of seven pairs.  It is the husband-wife duo of Indian-American Dr Abhijit Banerjee (born 1961) and French-American Dr Esther Duflo (born 1972) who shared the 2019 Economics Prize.